Sustainable
Agriculture Research and Education
Professional
Development Program
2004 Annual Report


The
Western Region
The goals
of the
• satisfy human food and fiber needs;
• enhance environmental quality and the natural resource upon which the agricultural economy depends;
• prevent agricultural pollution;
• make the most efficient use of non-renewable resources and integrate appropriate, natural biological cycles and controls;
• sustain the economic viability of farm operations; and
• enhance quality of life for farmers, rural communities, and society as a whole.
The
purpose of the
Dr.
Sue Blodgett,
Department of Entomology
(406) 994-2402
blodgett@montana.edu
Introduction:
Agriculture dominates
The wheat crops in
Many pests are sporadic in their occurrence cycling with environmental
conditions such as dry or wet cycles. However, major pests such as alfalfa
weevil (hay), wheat stem sawfly, wireworm and cutworm species (wheat) and
cereal leaf beetle are not likely to change dramatically from year to year.
Objectives
1. Provide opportunity for County Extension Agents and Specialist to receive in-depth training on annual cereal and legume forages productivity, legume and grass variety and type trials, cereal and legume fertilizer responses, grazing trials, forage kochia, long term irrigated pasture management, ranch management, wildlife enterprise development, sustainable livestock production and pest management.
Specialized Workshops and Training Programs
Field
Days or Field
2. Training and information about cropping systems, forage production systems and pest management under dryland/rainfed conditions.
Froid Farm Field Days and Crop Tour
3. Forage Winter Wheat Production for Hay or Grain
4. Alfalfa Stand Longevity Study.
5. Blackfeet Reservation EIRP
In
general, Montana
Each
year the
The
Professional Development Program continues to emphasize training and
development for agricultural production that balances food and fiber
production, economic viability and environmental and natural resource quality.
2004 Froid Research Farm Tour, June 24
Alfalfa Growers Workshop, June 25, 2004
An intensive on-campus school is conducted each year
that exposes participants to new technologies (internet, GPS, etc.) and
research updates on agricultural topics. In-depth treatment of all
aspects of crop pest management, hands-on laboratory experience, identification
of key pest species and problem-solving focuses on management issues. The
school emphasized laboratory hands-on problem solving and makes use of the
greenhouse and laboratory facilities of the
The 2004 CPMS featured Dan Roddy, a producer from
Chouteau County, providing a retrospective view of the dryland farming business
in north central Montana touching on the economic decline as evidenced by
depopulation, precipitous decline in school enrollment, closure of main street
businesses and farms, implementation of dealerships, pressure on government
services such as healthcare, welfare, and law enforcement, as poverty level
increases. However, the overall economy of north-central
Dr. Robert Zimdahl,
Notes from many of the presentations are available: http://scarab.msu.montana.edu/cpms/index.htm
Impacts:
· Trained 40 agricultural professionals on a variety of agricultural issues
· Supported 4 County Extension Agent to attend training
· Training provided on agricultural ethics and current agricultural systems.
Forage Winter Wheat Production for Hay or Grain in
|
Project Coordinator: George A. Reich Phone: (406) 285-6675 Fax: (406)
285-4303 Email: reichbros@theglobal.net |
Technical Advisor: Ron Carlstrom 901 N. Black Phone: (406)
582-3280 Fax: (406)
582-3273 Email: carlstrom@montana.edu |
Cooperators:
|
Mark
Cooper Cooper
Hereford Ranch |
Dr.
Dennis Cash, Extension Agronomist Animal
and Range Sciences Dept. |
|
Robert
S. Miller, Farmer |
Jake
Callantine Timberline
Ranch |
|
Leroy
and Brian Miller, Farm/Ranch Miler
Partnership |
Walt
Steingruber, Rancher |
Summary (Abstract)
This
project examined the agronomic characteristics of two types of forage winter
wheat that is available in limited supplies.
The project allowed producers to look at hay, and grain production of
these varieties and decide if they will fit in their specific
environments. Producers and technical
advisors were able to increase awareness in the agriculture community of a winter
wheat forage enterprise and the SARE funding through this project.
Objectives:
· Twenty producers will tour both the Willow Creek and
Pass Creek Test Sites
· Producers will gain knowledge in how the two
varieties grow in each area.
· Producers will see the varieties growing throughout
the growing season and not just at a field day.
· MSU Extension Agronomist will disseminate
information on the project to the general public though the popular press and
grower meetings.
· 1000 agricultural newsletters will disseminate
information on the project and study results.
· Eighty producers will gain knowledge of the SARE
program, the project and economics of growing forage winter wheat in rotation
for hay land during annual crop school in the springs of 2004 and 2005.
· A pre and post survey will be given to the 6
producers who will be involved with the program; the survey will examine their
attitudes and opinions before and following the trials.
Results:
A
tour of the sites was to be combined with the annual Gallatin Beef Producers
summer educational tour. The tour was
cancelled due to rain (we were happy for the rain, the area has been in drought
for several years). The county agent
was able to meet with several producers at the sites over the summer and
discuss the varieties. Producers are
interested in the project and want to see a variety released from MSU.
One
plot was seeded on April 30, 2004. This
is an uncommon practice since winter wheat will not form seed heads and mature
unless it reaches certain cold levels to cause vernalization. Two goals were
set for this plot. Goal 1) to
evaluate the amount of vegetative forage produced in the first year. Goal
2) Evaluate the amount of winter wheat forage produced on year 2 for hay
production. This 3-acre plot will
also be grazed in the spring of 2005. If
things work the way the producer hopes, he may only have to seed a mixture of
winter forage and spring hay barley on year one, and be able to harvest hay
crops two years.
Extension
agronomist, Dr. Dennis Cash, taught workshops on annual forage production
throughout
Sixty
Producers gained knowledge of the forage winter wheat project and were able to
see the crops growing at the Central Agriculture Research Station Forage Field
Day.
Field
trials were clipped for estimated forage yield and grain yield.
Due
to interest generated by field days and news releases, the limited seed left in
the project was distributed to eight Montana Counties. County Agents, Research Station Personnel and
producers selected sites and planted 4 to 5 acre plots using producer’s
equipment. A
A
growers meeting was held in Willow Creek.
Growers and technical advisors reviewed the information from the
plots. Growers expressed interest in the
one variety;
Due
to grower input
An
insert was incorporated into the Gallatin County Extension Agriculture
newsletter. The insert explained the
findings to date, explained the project and the future of the project. This insert went to 1,300 agricultural
producers, landowners and interested agriculture businesses in
Upcoming
events include an overview of the project presented during lunch at the 2005
Crop school.
Benefits or impacts on agriculture:
This
project impacts
· It provided viable winter forage, which producers
can grow.
· This forage crop will not cause dockage in winter
wheat grown for cereal production.
Winter barley, triticale, and rye have the potential to create dockage
problems in grain grown for cereal production.
· Producers found they could save labor costs by
planting a fall forage crop verses a spring forage crop.
· In the semi-arid and arid parts of
· By utilizing a spring planting program of forage
winter wheat and forage barley or oats mixed and planted, producers feel they
can save money by distributing the costs of seeding over 2 crop years.
· Producers feel the fall seeded forage winter wheat
will lessen soil erosion during critical winter periods.
Producer adoption:
Interest generated by field
days and workshops across the State, resulted in the distribution of the
limited seed left in the project to eight Montana Counties. Producers, County Agents, and Research
Station Personnel selected sites and planted 4 to 5 acre plots using producer’s
equipment. A
Producers
state the only thing holding back further adoption on their lands in
Reactions from producers:
Producers
felt the forage winter wheat fit into their crop rotation programs better than
other winter forages. One producer
stated that he would not seed rye or triticale since this would be introducing
weeds into his cropping system.
‘This
forage winter wheat provides me with the opportunity to plant in the fall when
I have available time’.
‘ I feel the forage winter wheat will give me
the opportunity to plant a crop that could be used for forage or harvested for
small grains. It opens up more
possibilities for my operation’.
‘
Winter forages may fit into a silage operation quite well’.
Irrigation
water requirements and savings in pumping costs as well as early harvesting
dates, makes forage winter wheat more desirable over corn for silage, even with
the reduced dry matter yield of forage winter wheat versus corn.
Recommendations:
Spring
planting of forage winter wheat and spring forages might increase the fall
grazing available, decrease seeding costs and provide valuable ground cover for
erosion control and wildlife.
Comparison
of fall winter wheat for forage with spring planted forage barley and oats, for
nutritional analysis and yield.
The
core producers recommend further study of forage winter wheat in varying
environmental conditions throughout the State of
Impacts:
An
insert was incorporated into the Gallatin County Extension Agriculture
newsletter. This insert went to 1,300
agricultural producers, landowners and interested agriculture businesses in
Information
was presented to the Gallatin County Extension Advisory Council in June of
2004.
Extension
agronomist, Dr. Dennis Cash, taught workshops on annual forage production
throughout
Sixty
Producers gained knowledge of the forage winter wheat project and were able to
see the crops growing at the Central Agriculture Research Station Forage Field
Day.
The
project has one final activity left for the FW04-018 grant, a crop school in
Willow Creek. This is scheduled for February
24, 2005.
|
Forage Winter Wheat
Production for Hay or Grain in This project examined the agronomic characteristics of two types of
forage winter wheat that are available in limited supplies. The project allows producers to look at
hay, and grain production of these varieties and decide if they will fit in
their specific environments. Producers
and technical advisors will be able to increase awareness in the agriculture
community of a winter wheat forage enterprise and the SARE funding through
this project. Finding a
forage winter wheat variety that will yield either as hay or for small grain
harvest will: help sustain the economic viability of farm/ranch operations,
while, allowing producers to enhance production by using the biological cycle
of winter wheat to their full advantage.
Producers will also be able to more efficiently utilize non-renewable
resources such as labor and machinery more effectively.
|
Two varieties
were identified for further production in the study. Lot 03-01 & Three plots in
Late September
2003 Planted plots
of both varieties at each location using the producers equipment and
fertilizer program. Plots varied in
size. Cooper’s plots were ¼ acre in
size and had two replications each. Miller’s plots were ¾ acre in size with
two replications each. Reich’s plots
were .57 acres in size, with three replications each. Both Willow
Creek locations suffered from winterkill. Reich’s %
winterkill Lot 03-01 95% Lot 03-02 50% Rampart and
Neely suffered 95 to 100% Cooper Lot 03-01 95% Lot 03-02 50% Miller’s plots
suffered from snow mold, Neely next to the plots also suffered. By spring green-up each plot had a 50%
stand. |
Lot 03-02 Reich’s
Dryland Plots
|